This is a sad case of Wow-I-Really-Was-Looking-Forward-To-This-Movie-Because-It-Has-'Cowboy'-In-The-Title-And-I-Love-Cowboys-And-Therefore-I-Assumed-I-Would-Enjoy-It-But-Instead-I-Was-Once-Again-Reminded-That-My-Idea-Of-Cowboys,-Which-Was-Forged-In-The-Fires-Of-My-Youthful-Days-As-An-Almost-Horse-girl-And-Nurtured-By-My-Continuous-Consumption-Of-Cowboy-Related-Media-Which-Originates-From-Or-Takes-Place-In-The-60s-(and by 60s I mean the ones that took place either in the nineteenth or twentieth centuries),-Does-Not-Always-Align-With-Other-People's-Ideas-About-Cowboys-And-Therefore-I-Am-Often-Dissappointed-By-People-Trying-To-Make-Cowboys-And-There-Stories-"Funny"-And-Crass-Rather-Than-Mournful-And-Wholesome.
It is, perhaps, a little-known fact that a movie only needs exactly one (1) ingredient to be a good movie. That ingredient is not a good director (what even is a director? The guy who clacks the black and white thing and shouts "action!"?). That ingredient is not beautiful cinematography (though The Big White has no shortage of that. I really liked the vast snowy landscapes and also the matching snowy whiteness of the insurance office, especially since it was snowing outside my window while I watched this movie and I guess that just felt serendipitous). That ingredient is not an incredible and talented cast—something I think everyone agree this movie has (Robin Williams, yes, but also this guy , who looks like Pete "Mad Men" Campbell, but isn't. I like him a lot and would like to see more of him!). That ingredient is not even—dare I say it?—Woody Harrelson. Many a movie, in fact, as this blog evidences, is very bad in spite of Woody's wonderful presence. ...
Comments
Post a Comment